The aim of this study was to assess how officer perceptions of Internal Procedural Justice (IPJ), based on the four dimensions of accountability, neutrality, voice and respect, influence officer attitudes towards serving the public. The key research objectives for this study were to:
1. Evaluate the existing literature surrounding the importance of supervisors in delivering IPJ and the impact of fair supervision on fair policing2. Investigate the relationship between fair supervision and fair policing in a UK setting3. Compare the findings from this study with those from earlier studies
Primary empirical research was undertaken. The research strategy adopted was a cross-sectional survey using a self-serve, electronic email-based survey with police constables, sergeants, PSCOs and special constables employed by Cumbria Police. This group aimed to represent front line policing roles within the UK. The sample size was 250, but all individuals within this wider group were invited to take part. The Survey items were adapted and adopted from an earlier officer survey conducted in Chicago (Van Craen & Skogan, 2017a). The data collated was analysed using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Structural Equation modeling (SEM), in an attempt to examine the relationship between Internal Procedural Justice (IPJ) or fair supervision and External Procedural Justice (EPJ) or fair policing. This research has implications for police forces in respect of offering a potential avenue through which police organisations may be able to influence officers to behave in ways that encourages public support for police.