Police detectives on the TOR-network: A study on tensions between privacy and crime fighting

Research Institution / Organisation

Northumbria University

In Collaboration With

An international research councils funded consortium with the Dutch Open University, The Politihøgskolen (Norwegian Police University College) & Stockholm University

Principal Researcher

Professor Tim J Wilson FCSFS

Level of Research

Professional / Work-based

Project Start Date

June 2017

Research Context

​The study will examine how society can properly deal with the tension between privacy and other fundamental rights of citizens (TOR-users) and the exercise of state power (police officers conducting investigations on the TOR-network), when this power is exercised for the purpose of preventing and investigating crime. The research will analyse the demands that are imposed on detective work by principles of forensic validity (ensuring that digital evidence is admissible) and legal fairness (due process and human rights). The published research will be based on the study of investigative methodology and ethics in three jurisdictions: England and Wales, the Netherlands and Norway, together with comparative law analyses of evidence, due process, human rights, and the rules governing international police and judicial cooperation

Research Methodology

​The research methodology will combine legal analysis, scientific/technical IT laboratory research (by Stockholm University) and empirical fieldwork in England and Wales, the Netherlands and Norway. The project will include workshops (including two in the UK) that will bring together investigators, lawyers and academics.

Interim reports and publications

​This project will build on earlier work within Northumbria University Law School on international police cooperation, comparative law and scientific/technical evidence. This can be accessed in academic publications, contributions to UK government reports and Parliamentary publications. See, for example:

  • G. Davies and A. Jackson, ‘Evaluating the European Criminal Record Information System (ECRIS) for the Exchange of Criminal Records Information between Member States: Establishing the Need for Post “Brexit” Sharing of Criminal Records Information’. International Journal of Evidence and Proof (in press).
  • Tim J Wilson, ‘Criminal Justice and Global Public Goods: The Prüm Forensic Biometric Cooperation Model’, The Journal of Criminal Law 2016, Vol. 80 (5) 303-326.
  • Brants, C, Jackson, A, and Koenraadt, F., Culpability compared: Mental capacity, criminal offences and the role of the expert in common law and civil law jurisdictions. (2016) Journal of International and Comparative Law, Vol. 3:2. pp. 411-440.
  • T. Wilson, ‘The Global Perspective’ in M. Peplow (ed.), Annual Report of the Government Chief Scientific Adviser 2015: Forensic Science and Beyond: Authenticity, Provenance and Assurance: Evidence and Case Studies (Government Office for Science: London, 2015) 82-93. 11 .
  • The House of Commons Justice Committee report, Implications of Brexit for the justice system (HC 2016-17 750 .

Date due for completion

May 2021
Return to Research Map